Launched in November 2003 the "Partnership for Open
Society"
initiative is an open coalition of a number of
interested civil society actors in Armenia. The
Partnership strives towards promotion of democratic
reform process in Armenia.

 Eng /Arm/Home/Site map/RSS
Search
ABOUT PARTNERSHIP
MEMBERS
NEWS & EVENTS
PARTNERSHIP STATEMENTS
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS
INITIATIVES
YOUR VOICE
PUBLICATIONS
USEFUL LINKS
POLICY BRIEFS
CONTACTS





Polling

Which is the most corrupt sphere in Armenia?
Healthcare
4
 
13.79%
Education
5
 
17.24%
Jurisdiction
8
 
27.59%
Agriculture
0
 
0%
Social
2
 
6.9%
Environmental
0
 
0%
Other
2
 
6.9%
Total: 29




 

PARTNERSHIP STATEMENTS

2013-09-24 | Statements

STATEMENT of EaP Civil Society Forum’s Armenian National Platform

 

STATEMENT
of EaP Civil Society Forum’s Armenian National Platform
17 September, 2013
With this statement, the Armenian National Platform of the Eastern Partnership (EaP) Civil Society
Forum (CSF), reconfirms its support for the enlargement of multilateral ties between the Republic of
Armenia, foreign states and international organizations. At the same time, we express our disagreement
and deep frustration regarding the statement of the President of the Republic of Armenia on joining the
Customs Union and participating in the formation of the Eurasian Union.
For about three and a half years, the Armenian authorities were negotiating the Association Agreement
with the EU in the framework of the Eastern Partnership, including a Deep and Comprehensive Free
Trade Area (DCFTA) Agreement. It seems that the Armenian authorities had shown absolute
commitment to the drafting and implementation of this crucially important document. However, the
announcement by the Armenian President came to prove exactly the opposite.
The intentions of the Armenian authorities to join the Customs Union to the detriment of the Association
Agreement with the EU contradict their numerous statements where they have declared European
integration as a foreign policy priority.
It makes meaningless the huge efforts and expense by the Republic of Armenia and the EU in recent
years directed to holding negotiations and drafting documents. Numerous projects aimed at
implementing reforms in different spheres of life and strengthening relations with the EU, which demand
significant resources, have now become useless. Completed projects will not lead to any results and the
current projects are now jeopardized.
It is an unprecedented phenomenon, when a country having a far lower level of political and economic
development than the European Union, practically refuses to be integrated in the largest economy of the
world and deepen multilateral cooperation with the most sustainable region on the planet, and
specifically, when this refusal took place in the context of joining the Customs Union, which at this point
1
does not justify itself even for those countries that have already joined it and which prospects are quite
vague.
Serzh Sargsyan’s surprising announcement, which had such consequences, caused unrecoverable
damage to Armenia’s international reputation as a trustworthy partner.
The claims of officials, politicians and some “too loyal” experts in our country, who tried to put the
blame of the failure of the Association Agreement initialing on the Brussels’ shoulder, cannot stand any
criticism. We find the decision by the European Union not to consider about 80 percent shortened
(without deep and comprehensive free trade agreement) document completely substantial and normal,
because no prior consultation and negotiation were held around this new approach.
Moreover, the assessments about the economic calculations and security risks sound quite
inconclusive. If such kind of concerns could be an obstacle on the way of association with the
European Union, then they should have been revealed and studied much earlier and not at the end of
negotiations. In that case, the preference that Yerevan gave to the Customs Union would be
considered as more worthy and acceptable by all international partners and Armenian society.
However, now all grounds are there to talk about national humiliation.
Even if we assume, that by joining to the Customs Union the RA authorities received some immediate
benefits for security and other spheres, there are, however, many reasons to suspect that for a
longterm
perspective country will become more vulnerable in terms of external threats. And the
biggest of these threats is the tendency to neglect the interests of Armenia by international community
and the uncontrolled process of concession of sovereignty.
Today, with the difficult socialeconomic
situation there are new factors arising, which only strengthen
emigration, one of the most pressing and painful problems in the Republic of Armenia.
The rumors that are being spread presumably not without the direct involvement of the Armenian
authorities, implying that the decision was made under pressure, cannot justify the denial of previous
constant assurances about the irrevocable path towards the Association Agreement. When such a
crucial decision for the country is being made, external factors, of course, exist, and all Eastern
Partnership countries have faced it. However, the decisions that are most stable and protected from
risks are those based on the consensus in the society about the realization of national interests. The
Armenian government has done nothing to inform the society about the content and benefits of the
Association Agreement as well as the European Integration in general, leaving the stage for cheap
speculations about imaginary “European values”.
All the above mentioned circumstances allow us to confirm that the decision about the Customs Union
was made based on the narrow interests of a small circle of people, who were not intending to
2
implement the broader package of reforms designed within the framework of the Eastern Partnership,
more specifically, the Association Agreement.
For the current situation, the international organizations, particularly the EU institutions have their share
of responsibility. They have been going beyond the limits of tolerance in their relations with the
Armenian authorities, many times going along with the imitation of fulfilling obligations and choosing a
“more for less” formula. Apparently this served as basis for the Republic of Armenia’s political elite to
treat the EaP process without proper seriousness and responsibility.
Another negative factor was the absence of real partnership, understanding of mutual priorities and
benefits as well as the willingness for mutual assistance between the Eastern Partnership countries. As a
result, each of the countries was acting alone considering the failures and drawbacks of a neighbour as
their own advantage. We hope that Armenia’s undesirable precedent will reveal the need for change of
relationships inside the “Six”.
The intention to join the Custom’s Union and the failure of initialing the Association Agreement is a
serious turnover in the areas of internal and foreign policy, socioeconomic
development and many
other fields. Decisions of such importance should not be made without discussions in the National
Assembly, government, Security Council and public debates. The lack of formal consultations sets
background for us to perceive the Armenian President's statement on September 3rd as a part of
oneman
policy which we cannot consider unchangable.
In the current situation we demand from the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia to convene
parliamentary hearings and invite special session, which will evaluate the latest announcement of the
President of Armenia. We call on the MPs to be above political affiliations and demonstrate a
transpartial
position on the issue of joining the Customs Union and refusing the Association
Agreement, as this choice goes beyond the interests of certain political parties and predicts the future of
Armenia for a longterm
period.
We invite the representatives of the Armenian authorities to take part in the conference of the Eastern
Partnership Civil Society Forum’s National Platform, which will take place in hotel “Hrazdan”, on 19
September 2013, 14:0017:
00; and present the justifications for Sargsyan’s announcement and the
failure of the initialing of Association Agreement.
We are sure that for every single citizen of the Republic of Armenia who knows the consequences of
this choice, who values the independence which was gained through big losses and appreciates the
democratic development of the country, the decision announced on September 3 cannot be accepted.
The situation can be improved only by consolidation of nonindifferent
layers of the society and by civic
activism. Irrespective of the developments of the coming months the Armenian National Platform of the
Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forums will be faithful to the European integration process and invites
all the interested people for close cooperation.
3

With this statement, the Armenian National Platform of the Eastern Partnership (EaP) Civil Society

Forum (CSF), reconfirms its support for the enlargement of multilateral ties between the Republic of

Armenia, foreign states and international organizations. At the same time, we express our disagreement

and deep frustration regarding the statement of the President of the Republic of Armenia on joining the

Customs Union and participating in the formation of the Eurasian Union.

For about three and a half years, the Armenian authorities were negotiating the Association Agreement

with the EU in the framework of the Eastern Partnership, including a Deep and Comprehensive Free

Trade Area (DCFTA) Agreement. It seems that the Armenian authorities had shown absolute

commitment to the drafting and implementation of this crucially important document. However, the

announcement by the Armenian President came to prove exactly the opposite.

The intentions of the Armenian authorities to join the Customs Union to the detriment of the Association

Agreement with the EU contradict their numerous statements where they have declared European

integration as a foreign policy priority.

It makes meaningless the huge efforts and expense by the Republic of Armenia and the EU in recent

years directed to holding negotiations and drafting documents. Numerous projects aimed at

implementing reforms in different spheres of life and strengthening relations with the EU, which demand

significant resources, have now become useless. Completed projects will not lead to any results and the

current projects are now jeopardized.

It is an unprecedented phenomenon, when a country having a far lower level of political and economic

development than the European Union, practically refuses to be integrated in the largest economy of the

world and deepen multilateral cooperation with the most sustainable region on the planet, and

specifically, when this refusal took place in the context of joining the Customs Union, which at this point

does not justify itself even for those countries that have already joined it and which prospects are quite

vague.

Serzh Sargsyan’s surprising announcement, which had such consequences, caused unrecoverable

damage to Armenia’s international reputation as a trustworthy partner.

The claims of officials, politicians and some “too loyal” experts in our country, who tried to put the

blame of the failure of the Association Agreement initialing on the Brussels’ shoulder, cannot stand any

criticism. We find the decision by the European Union not to consider about 80 percent shortened

(without deep and comprehensive free trade agreement) document completely substantial and normal,

because no prior consultation and negotiation were held around this new approach.

Moreover, the assessments about the economic calculations and security risks sound quite

inconclusive. If such kind of concerns could be an obstacle on the way of association with the

European Union, then they should have been revealed and studied much earlier and not at the end of

negotiations. In that case, the preference that Yerevan gave to the Customs Union would be

considered as more worthy and acceptable by all international partners and Armenian society.

However, now all grounds are there to talk about national humiliation.

Even if we assume, that by joining to the Customs Union the RA authorities received some immediate

benefits for security and other spheres, there are, however, many reasons to suspect that for a

longterm

perspective country will become more vulnerable in terms of external threats. And the

biggest of these threats is the tendency to neglect the interests of Armenia by international community

and the uncontrolled process of concession of sovereignty.

Today, with the difficult socialeconomic

situation there are new factors arising, which only strengthen

emigration, one of the most pressing and painful problems in the Republic of Armenia.

The rumors that are being spread presumably not without the direct involvement of the Armenian

authorities, implying that the decision was made under pressure, cannot justify the denial of previous

constant assurances about the irrevocable path towards the Association Agreement. When such a

crucial decision for the country is being made, external factors, of course, exist, and all Eastern

Partnership countries have faced it. However, the decisions that are most stable and protected from

risks are those based on the consensus in the society about the realization of national interests. The

Armenian government has done nothing to inform the society about the content and benefits of the

Association Agreement as well as the European Integration in general, leaving the stage for cheap

speculations about imaginary “European values”.

All the above mentioned circumstances allow us to confirm that the decision about the Customs Union

was made based on the narrow interests of a small circle of people, who were not intending to

implement the broader package of reforms designed within the framework of the Eastern Partnership,

more specifically, the Association Agreement.

For the current situation, the international organizations, particularly the EU institutions have their share

of responsibility. They have been going beyond the limits of tolerance in their relations with the

Armenian authorities, many times going along with the imitation of fulfilling obligations and choosing a

“more for less” formula. Apparently this served as basis for the Republic of Armenia’s political elite to

treat the EaP process without proper seriousness and responsibility.

Another negative factor was the absence of real partnership, understanding of mutual priorities and

benefits as well as the willingness for mutual assistance between the Eastern Partnership countries. As a

result, each of the countries was acting alone considering the failures and drawbacks of a neighbour as

their own advantage. We hope that Armenia’s undesirable precedent will reveal the need for change of

relationships inside the “Six”.

The intention to join the Custom’s Union and the failure of initialing the Association Agreement is a

serious turnover in the areas of internal and foreign policy, socioeconomic

development and many

other fields. Decisions of such importance should not be made without discussions in the National

Assembly, government, Security Council and public debates. The lack of formal consultations sets

background for us to perceive the Armenian President's statement on September 3rd as a part of

oneman

policy which we cannot consider unchangable.

In the current situation we demand from the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia to convene

parliamentary hearings and invite special session, which will evaluate the latest announcement of the

President of Armenia. We call on the MPs to be above political affiliations and demonstrate a

transpartial

position on the issue of joining the Customs Union and refusing the Association

Agreement, as this choice goes beyond the interests of certain political parties and predicts the future of

Armenia for a longterm

period.

We invite the representatives of the Armenian authorities to take part in the conference of the Eastern

Partnership Civil Society Forum’s National Platform, which will take place in hotel “Hrazdan”, on 19

September 2013, 14:0017:

00; and present the justifications for Sargsyan’s announcement and the

failure of the initialing of Association Agreement.

We are sure that for every single citizen of the Republic of Armenia who knows the consequences of

this choice, who values the independence which was gained through big losses and appreciates the

democratic development of the country, the decision announced on September 3 cannot be accepted.

The situation can be improved only by consolidation of nonindifferent

layers of the society and by civic

activism. Irrespective of the developments of the coming months the Armenian National Platform of the

Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forums will be faithful to the European integration process and invites

all the interested people for close cooperation.

 

17 September, 2013

 

Latest

06.10.2015 | News
Description of audit activities on potential fraud and abuse in “ENA” CJSC.
read more>>
11.03.2016 | Upcoming Events
Public discussion series “Draft of New Electoral Code and Issues of Realization of Electoral Right in Armenia” in Yerevan, Gyumri and Vanadzor.

The Partnership for Open Society Initiative, representing more than 60 civil society organizations, is pleased to invite you to participate in public discussion series titled “Draft of New Electoral Code and Issues of Realization of Electoral Right in Armenia” in Yerevan, Gyumri and Vanadzor.

read more>>

POS statements

15.02.2016 | Statements
Statement on the Drafting of the New Electoral Code of the Republic of Armenia.

We would like to call your attention to the statement on the Drafting of the New Electoral Code of the Republic of Armenia. The statement is open for signature.

read more>>

Subscribe to POS news